The challenge in modern family marketing

Most marketing strategies for families are based on a dangerously outdated mantra: Children are “digital natives,” so we reach them digitally. This dogma is not only inadequate — it is a minefield for wasted budgets and reputational risks. Anyone who clings to this simple image ignores the complex power structure of the modern family and risks failing both the decisive gatekeepers and the most influential internal influencers.

As a marketing decision maker or brand manager, you navigate through a sea of contradictory data every day: Is media consumption now a development aid or poison? Who makes the purchase decision — the child in front of the screen or the parents with the wallet?

Ignoring this complexity is no longer an option; it is a strategic liability. This article is not another data report. It is a strategic briefing.

From the latest studies, we extract four well-founded insights that dismantle the outdated “digital native” model and provide you with clear, actionable recommendations for action.

Our promise: You will no longer see the family as a collection of individuals, but as a networked ecosystem — and position your brand in it successfully and responsibly.

‍

The insights: What marketing decision makers need to know now

Insight 1: The myth of the “digital native” — parents are and remain the gatekeepers

The new reality: The almost dogmatic focus on digitally savvy children overlooks the decisive role of parents. They are not only the payers, but the primary curators, role models and regulators of their children's overall media consumption.

The data doesn't lie: The family is the most fundamental place for “formative media education,” with parents acting as a central “model.” This example is supported by clear rules: According to the ADELE+ study, 72% to 79% of parents set fixed rules for television, videos or games.

However, as children get older, the dynamic changes dramatically. While restrictive time rules dominate among 10 to 12-year-olds (79.2%), these control mechanisms are becoming noticeably less effective among older adolescents. At the same time, parents' uncertainty in dealing with digital risks peaks precisely in this phase. This “control-anxiety gap” is the biggest strategic opportunity for brands to build trust.

Your strategic move: Stop trying at Kids for sale. Start creating content that helps parents in the digital age better to educate. Your brand must change from just an entertainer for children to a trustworthy partner for parents who are looking for guidance in digital uncertainty.

Provide solutions for “good” media use, proactively address parental concerns and strengthen them in their role. This is the path to sustainable brand loyalty in the family segment.

Insight 2: The child as a co-decision maker and most powerful internal influencer

The new reality: Despite the irrevocable gatekeeper role of parents, we navigate the parent-child paradox: The child acts as the most powerful internal influencer and has a massive, direct influence on the family's buying decisions.

The data doesn't lie: The figures from the “KINDER MEDIA MONITOR” are a clear message to every marketer: At 88%, the child himself is the second most important source of information for parents when buying products. Only the information in the shop itself (91%) ranks higher.

This makes the child's wish more influential than traditional advertising (60%), recommendations from friends (55%) or online reviews (63%). Children's brand preferences are extremely high, particularly in categories such as sports shoes, toys and game consoles — and parents fulfill this wish in most cases.

Your strategic move: The child's “I want” impulse is the most powerful media buy that you can't buy directly. Your task is to make this impulse possible. Your marketing strategy must provide parents with the rational arguments they need to justify the child's purchase decision, which has already been made emotionally, to themselves. You're not just selling a product; you're arming parents for internal family negotiation.

Impress parents with quality, safety or educational value, while you inspire desire in the child through fun, coolness and belonging.

Insight 3: The “Kidfluencer” Economy — When the Game Turns Serious

The new reality: “Child influencing” has developed from a hobby into a serious sector of the economy. For marketers, however, this channel is an ethical and legal minefield that requires utmost care.

The data doesn't lie: A study by the University of Halle defines “child influencing” as the economically motivated presentation of children, usually controlled by parents. This creates an indissoluble conflict of interest: Parents act as carers and as “managers” at the same time. According to experts, as soon as money flows, this activity is considered paid work and is subject to the strict rules of the Youth Employment Protection Act (JarbSchG), which requires official approval. When financial interests outweigh the best interests of the child, there is a clear risk situation.

Your strategic move: Treat Kidfluencer marketing not as a standard tool, but as a high-risk specialty discipline. Reputational damage and legal consequences are real risks. Cooperate exclusively with families who demonstrably and transparently place the best interests of the child above financial interests.

Put potential partnerships through their paces. Future, stricter regulations based on the French model — which requires mandatory escrow accounts for children's income — are only a matter of time. Act responsibly now.

Insight 4: The context decides — media as a social bonfire and source of conflict

The new reality: The blanket debate about “screen time” is a strategic dead end. Whether digital media connect or divide families depends solely on the context of use.

The data doesn't lie: The study situation shows the enormous ambivalence of media use. On the one hand, the phenomenon of “phubbing”: 35.2% of children feel ignored by their counterpart's smartphone use, which leads to conflicts. On the other hand, studies show that digital media can also “have a positive effect on family members' relationships” by providing relaxation and fun together. According to experts, the most important form of media literacy is “shared, shared media experience.”

Your strategic move: While your competitors focus on individuals' isolated “screen time,” you can win over “family time.” Position your offer as the antidote to digital isolation (“phubbing”) and as an enabler of the modern “social campfire.” It's more than just a messaging tweak; it's a fundamental repositioning strategy.

Market your game as a family challenge, your app as a creative tool for parents and children, your streaming service as an occasion for a movie night together. Brands that promote cooperation gain a firm place in the heart of the family.

‍

Conclusion: The path to responsible family marketing

The four insights unequivocally prove that a simple “child as a target” perspective is obsolete. Successful marketing requires a deep understanding of the entire family ecosystem. Parents are the unavoidable gatekeepers, children are the most powerful internal influencers. New channels such as kidfluencing involve significant risks, and the context of use determines the positive or negative impact of your message.

The future belongs to brands that act responsibly, context-sensitively and with respect for family dynamics. They do not see themselves as mere product providers, but as partners who enrich family life.

For your next campaign, don't just ask yourself “How do we reach the child?” , but “What role do we play in the complex fabric of the family?”

‍

‍

Common questions (FAQ)

1. Isn't influencer marketing with children fundamentally ethically questionable and legally a grey area?
It is highly complex from a legal point of view. As soon as money flows, it is considered paid work and is subject to the Youth Employment Protection Act, which requires official approval. For parents, there is a conflict of interest between their duty of care and financial motives. It is ethically problematic, as the children's informed consent is questionable and their privacy and psychological development can be jeopardized.

2. My product is clearly designed for children. Why should I focus my marketing budget on parents?
Because parents are the ultimate “gatekeepers.” They set the rules for media consumption and act as role models. However, their role in the buying process is decisive: According to the KINDER MEDIA MONITOR, the child himself is the second most important source of information (88%) for parents' buying decisions, even before traditional advertising (60%) or online reviews (63%). An address that only reaches the child ignores the decisive final decision maker.

3. How valid are studies on media use if they are often based only on information provided by parents?
This is a recognized methodological limitation (“proxy survey”). It is possible for parents to gloss over their behavior or their children's periods of use. However, the ADELE+ study explicitly examined this “socially desirable response behavior” and found that it played only a minor distorting role in the conducted online survey.

4. Is there evidence that high media consumption really harms children? The debate is often very hysterical.
The studies paint a differentiated picture. On the one hand, the ADELE+ study found only “small effects” between media use and health problems among preschool children. On the other hand, the DAK study shows relevant prevalences for risky or pathological use for older children (10-17 years), particularly in social media, which affects over 1.3 million children and adolescents. Context and type of use are decisive, not pure time.

5. Apart from digital media, which leisure activities are still relevant for families?
Analogous activities are still extremely popular. According to the KINDER MEDIA MONITOR, the most common leisure activities of children aged 4-13 years are painting/crafts (89%), playing with dolls (82%) and playing with stuffed animals (80%). This underlines the continued high relevance of haptic and creative products in everyday family life.

‍

sources

• ADELE+ The use of media by preschool children (4—6 years) - ZHAW
• KIDS MEDIA MONITOR 2025
• Promoting media literacy for children and young people - Society for Media Education and Communication Culture (GMK)
• Problematic media use among children and adolescents in Germany - DAK health
• “Between privacy and audience — children on social media” - University of Halle
• DIGITALLY DESIGNING A FAMILY - JFF — Institute for Media Education